Aviva Investors Multi-Asset Range with Peter Smith
How did the Aviva’s Multi-Asset Range perform in 20241?
Aviva Investors’ Multi-Asset Funds delivered solid absolute and relative performance in 2024.
Gross fund performance to 01 January 20251
Warning: Past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance.
What drove the strong performance for Passive Plus and Fixed Allocation Funds?
The Aviva Fixed ESG funds are index-tracking funds, and the Aviva Multi-Asset ESG Passive Plus fund range uses a long-term strategic asset allocation. Therefore, the performance of these funds is driven by the performance of the underlying markets.
Global equities performed incredibly well in 2024, returning 25% in euro terms. This was despite several bouts of volatility, driven by uncertainty surrounding the potential for political upheaval, fears of a US recession, and sticky inflation. Markets were supported by global growth, which generally proved resilient, alongside continued rate cuts by central banks. In particular, the S&P 500 was a stand-out performer, posting a return of over 33% in euro terms. This was primarily driven by the Magnificent 7 stocks, which delivered an exceptional 67% return over the year. Trump’s election victory also provided an additional boost to the index in the fourth quarter. European equities posted a smaller gain over the year due to continued weakness in macro data and uncertainty caused by political shocks in France and Germany.
Most fixed-income assets delivered a positive performance in 2024, though this was less pronounced than growth assets. Rate cuts took longer than initially expected due to upside inflation surprises earlier in the year. In January, markets priced in approximately 6 rate cuts by the Fed, while they only delivered three. This saw global bond yields trend higher prior to a dovish pivot by developed central banks in H2 as inflation showed signs of easing.
How about the Active Multi-Asset Funds?
The Multi-Asset ESG Active funds have a strategic asset allocation, which drives performance over the long term. Additionally, the funds use tactical asset allocation to take advantage of shorter-term opportunities in the market where the fund manager believes they can add value. Overall, the active tactical asset allocation added to performance in 2024. The overweight equity position has been additive in 2024, especially the exposure to US equities, which we have increased over the year. US tech stocks benefitted from continued revenue growth driven by the AI boom, optimism surrounding the US’ soft landing’ and, in the final quarter, the Republican Party’s clean sweep. The overweight exposure to European and Japanese equities was closed in the latter half of the year. The former was closed due to weak macro prospects, whilst we decided to take profit on the Japanese equities position following opportunistic trading during August’s market volatility. We also closed the US / EM equity relative value trade after the PBOC (the Chinese Central Bank) announced a substantial stimulus package in September. The funds maintained an overall neutral position within fixed income, with regional variations. The tactical positions in fixed income detracted from performance during the year, largely due to the overweight position in Gilts. Despite rate cuts by the Bank of England, yields were impacted by concerns about higher spending following the UK Budget announcement in October. The short position in Japanese government bonds helped to offset some of this.
What’s Aviva Investors outlook for markets in 2025?
The year ahead will likely be marked by significant policy uncertainty, leading to various possible outcomes for the global economy. However, this does not imply that the world is heading towards a recession and will be a poor environment for risky assets. Instead, the policy uncertainty suggests a wide distribution of possible outcomes, both positive and negative. Elections, as the saying goes, have consequences. The return of President Trump to the White House is expected to bring a host of important changes across the policy spectrum, from trade to tax and spending, regulation, immigration, and foreign policy. Any one of these would be significant, so the combination and sequencing of all of them will no doubt prove challenging for markets to digest. The positive reaction of US equities suggests markets view these policy changes as unlikely to derail the US economy. We broadly agree although the range of possible outcomes is wide. This is even more pertinent outside the US, where policymakers will respond via trade, fiscal, and monetary policies. Europe is facing the dual challenge of a more difficult trading relationship with the US, alongside softening Chinese growth (and potential pressure from the US to reduce ties with China). As with growth, the range of possible outcomes for inflation next year is also wide, especially in the US, where we would expect any tariffs to be passed through to consumer prices. Hence, we think central banks will be cautious in reacting strongly without a clear signal of a change in growth or inflation trends.